Your message dated Thu, 09 Mar 2017 17:17:06 +0100 with message-id <1489076226.11815.3.camel@debian.org> and subject line Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#818884: Bug#818884: ping has caused the Debian Bug report #818884, regarding OCR-B font to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 818884: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818884 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: OCR-B font
- From: Lachlan Gunn <lachlan@twopif.net>
- Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 21:45:48 +1030
- Message-id: <56EFD7E4.4040408@twopif.net>
Package: fonts-ocr-a Priority: wishlist Hello, I'm looking to package the OCR-B font from http://ansuz.sooke.bc.ca/fonts.php , however it includes OCR-A in the distribution, so I was wondering whether I should go ahead and just package B, or whether you might be interested in having a combined package, assuming it isn't any worse than the current one. Have you perhaps any suggestions? Thanks, Lachlan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Gürkan Myczko <gurkan@phys.ethz.ch>, 818884-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#818884: Bug#818884: ping
- From: Fabian Greffrath <fabian@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 17:17:06 +0100
- Message-id: <1489076226.11815.3.camel@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] F185FAC5-A448-4C0D-A3A2-4DA8C420D8FC@phys.ethz.ch>
- References: <[🔎] 44cbffa4c23e5fe10d01bb797abd957d@phys.ethz.ch> <[🔎] 1489073033.11815.1.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] F185FAC5-A448-4C0D-A3A2-4DA8C420D8FC@phys.ethz.ch>
Am Donnerstag, den 09.03.2017, 16:38 +0100 schrieb Gürkan Myczko: > very nice. i guess this bug should be closed then... Definitely, there shouldn't have been two WNPP bugs for the same package in the first place anyway. - FabianAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---