[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] New package fonts-sil-awami-nastaliq

On 2017-10-08 05:27, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> 1) You seem to install a truetype font into the /u/s/fonts/opentype
> location:
> ./usr/share/fonts/opentype/awami/AwamiNastaliq-Regular.ttf

Fixed, thank you.

> 2) You apply a lintian overrides against the source package which in
> fact gets reported against the changes file, so you end up with a
> lintian warning and an unused override:
> $ lintian ../fonts-sil-awami-nastaliq_1.000-1_amd64.changes 
> W: fonts-sil-awami-nastaliq changes: orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature fonts-sil-awami-nastaliq_1.000.orig.tar.xz
> [...]
> I: fonts-sil-awami-nastaliq source: unused-override orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature

I changed the override (as you can see in the diff below)

-fonts-sil-awami-nastaliq source: orig-tarball-missing-upstream-sig...
+fonts-sil-awami-nastaliq changes: orig-tarball-missing-upstream-sig...

and lintian says

E: fonts-sil-awami-nastaliq source: malformed-override Override of
orig-tarball-missing-upstream-signature for package type changes
(expecting source) at line 13

https://lintian.debian.org/manual/section-2.4.html says the type should
be one of "binary, udeb and source"

This was on an updated stretch system. Do I need a newer system than
stretch? Or is there something else I missed?

Thanks, Bobby

Bobby de Vos

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: