Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fontconfig author and WOFF
- To: Jonas Smedegaard <jonas@jones.dk>, Debian pkg fonts devel <pkg-fonts-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] fontconfig author and WOFF
- From: Bobby de Vos <bobby_devos@sil.org>
- Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 17:49:01 -0600
- Message-id: <[🔎] a582782b-1c2c-fb08-dbfd-1245eb0003d1@sil.org>
- In-reply-to: <150672562848.24952.364922035781216947@auryn.jones.dk>
- References: <89a0d850-516e-ba08-2aa2-d98d64032438@sil.org> <150207166235.3213.3413420615973355551@auryn.jones.dk> <b80283f4-538a-05b6-f9d9-a1a62ececcf7@sil.org> <150214001106.8596.17856648537041666640@auryn.jones.dk> <f5f81747-fae2-ee40-74b2-77eec356dea1@sil.org> <150672562848.24952.364922035781216947@auryn.jones.dk>
On 2017-09-29 16:53, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Bobby de Vos (2017-09-29 23:05:13)
>> On 2017-08-07 15:06, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
>>> Quoting Bobby de Vos (2017-08-07 16:31:18)
>>>> I don't feel like doing the second item unless there is consensus in
>>>> Debian. So I will do the (unlisted) fourth item which is not to ship
>>>> WOFF in Debian packages.
>>>
>>> Whoa, wait: I want fonts shipped and I want them kept together. But
>>> if I cannot have both, then I prefer the former over than none of
>>> them.
>> I can place the WOFF files (along with the .html and .css that need
>> the WOFF) in /usr/share/<package>/ since as you noted a while back
>> that documentation files should not rely on the existence of other
>> files in /usr/share/doc. However, that would contradict the fonts
>> packaging policy at https://wiki.debian.org/Fonts/PackagingPolicy
>
> Yes: Keith and Fabian both suggest to violate our established Policy.
I have now updated the packaging for the Annapurna font (Debian
packaging version -4) to include the WOFF files in as discussed above.
Please take a look and let me know if anything needs to be changed.
Packaging files are located at
https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-fonts/fonts-sil-annapurna.git/
Thanks, Bobby
--
Bobby de Vos
/bobby_devos@sil.org/
Reply to: