Hideki Yamane <henrich@debian.or.jp> writes: > Hi, > > On Sun, 26 Feb 2017 19:42:25 +0530 > Vasudev Kamath <vasudev-debian@copyninja.info> wrote: >> > I'll make a patch for it later. > > Here's a patch for fontforge-doc. Could you review it, please? I've updated package now with fontforge-doc package. I did it slightly different way instead of manually copying rely on build system to install the package. Please have a look at latest commit on git. I've not uploaded it yet, if you think its necessary I will upload to unstable. Let me know. (Or ofcourse you can upload it yourself). > > > fontforge-extra is another issue, IMO. Because fontforge-doc should > provide current fontforge information, so it should be the same version. > And -extras seems to be _better_ to be generated with fontforge source > package in next step. Can we now consider generating fontforge-extras from fontforge file?. Will you request removal of fontforge-extras?.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature