On Tue, 2016-09-20 at 12:02 -0400, Daniel Glassey wrote: > Since fonts are related to i18n and l10n, it would make sense to me, > if possible, for that review to be run on something like > i18n.debian.org I don't think fonts and i18n/l10n should be part of the same service. > Paul, how much maintainence is there for the font review service? The existing service is essentially unmaintained, so zero. The existing service is ugly and poorly architected though. Here is what I think needs to happen: * Plan to start from scratch not just run the existing code somewhere * Discuss and write down the high-level goals of the service * Discuss and write down the specific features of the service * Discuss and write down the proposed architecture of the service * Discuss and write down the proposed implementation of the service * Start working on the new codebase * Talk to tarzeau/aurel32 about the fonts.debian.net domain * Put the experimental version online at fonts.debian.net * Find a team to maintain the service into the future * Talk to DSA about moving it to fonts.debian.org * Integrate it with other Debian infra like packages.d.o/tracker.d.o * Keep the wiki page up to date throughout this process: https://wiki.debian.org/Services/DebianFontReview I won't be participating in shepherding this process nor implementation but I'm happy to inject some ideas where needed. For example, the new service could replace this wiki page: https://wiki.debian.org/Fonts/UnicodeCoverage -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part