Quoting Vasudev Kamath (2015-10-12 10:27:35) > Fabian Greffrath <fabian@debian.org> writes: >> Am Samstag, den 10.10.2015, 20:29 +0530 schrieb Vasudev Kamath: >>> Any one knows what really happened here?. I never followed >>> development of Android fonts and now I'm confused by these changes. >> >> me neither. My only guess is that Droid fonts have been absorbed into >> Noto fonts and Roboto fonts have been split out into a separate >> independent project (as you already pointed out). > > I see. Now package contains only fallback DroidSans fonts. I wonder if > its still meaningful to package it. It is meaningful to package fallback DroidSans fonts: It has reverse dependencies! But it sure makes sense to check if current upstream is bogus - i.e. if development has moved somewhere else. >> But this is really just based on hear-say, maybe other have a better >> educated point of view. > > Lets hope some one has better idea. :-). Why wait for more solid proof? Original package was based on an assumption, I believe, and now we have another. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature