Hi Paride, Am Donnerstag, den 03.09.2015, 14:27 +0200 schrieb Paride Legovini: > Here I'm not sure about what to do. The upstream distribution is a .zip > file with just the .ttf files, I manually repackaged this into the > .orig.tar.xz package, and here I'm already unsure if this way to proceed > is correct. this should be alright. > It's true that the upstream .zip does not contain a license file, but > the git repository does, and it's where I took what I put in the > debian/copyright file. Should I manually add this file to the .orig > archive? Or should I add a note about where to find this file? It should be reproducible where you found the license. Regarding including the license texts in the tarball, the SIL license is more explicit about this in §2, but the Bitstream license just states: The above copyright and trademark notices and this permission notice shall be included in all copies of one or more of the Font Software typefaces. I guess it depends on what is regarded as "copy", since the binary .ttf files themselves have the license texts embedded, but I'd rather go for sure. Cheers, Fabian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part