[Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#785456: update package description
Source: fonts-ipamj-mincho
Version: 003.01-1
Severity: normal
For ordinary people, the differences between:
fonts-ipafont-mincho
fonts-ipaexfont-mincho
fonts-ipamj-mincho
are difficult to figure out from their package description since they
are not synchronized. I read the upstream web site and summarized them
in the consistent set of the description. I hope the differences are
clear from this updated package description.
I attach my patch against the jessie package.
FYI: I filed bug report for other packages too.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
-- no debconf information
diff -Nru fonts-ipamj-mincho-003.01.orig/debian/control fonts-ipamj-mincho-003.01/debian/control
--- fonts-ipamj-mincho-003.01.orig/debian/control 2014-10-01 11:30:32.000000000 +0900
+++ fonts-ipamj-mincho-003.01/debian/control 2015-05-16 22:57:02.803756352 +0900
@@ -13,6 +13,16 @@
Architecture: all
Depends: ${misc:Depends}
Multi-Arch: foreign
-Description: Japanese OpenType font, IPAmj Mincho font
- IPAmj Mincho font is an OpenType font of the TrueType base
- based on ISO/IEC10646.
+Description: Japanese OpenType font, IPAmj Mincho Font
+ IPAmj Mincho Font is ISO/IEC10646:2014 compliant OpenType font based on
+ TrueType outlines supporting IVS (Ideographic Variation Sequence)
+ provided by Information-technology Promotion Agency, Japan (IPA) from
+ 2014.
+ .
+ IPAmj Mincho Font is designed to distinguish minute gliph differences of
+ the person's name etc. This font requires to use applications which are
+ compatible with the UCS code point beyond 16 bits and IVS. For the normal
+ use, any one of IPAex fonts that conforms to JIS X 0213:2004 is
+ recommended.
+ .
+ There is no IPAmj Gothic Font.
Reply to: