Your message dated Sat, 17 May 2014 13:27:04 +0200 with message-id <20140517112703.GC1921@zouish.org> and subject line Re: fonts-liberation: U+266B incorrect glyph with extra beam has caused the Debian Bug report #724839, regarding fonts-liberation: U+266B incorrect glyph with extra beam to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 724839: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=724839 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: fonts-liberation: U+266B incorrect glyph with extra beam
- From: Drake Wilson <drake@dasyatidae.net>
- Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2013 10:49:49 -0500
- Message-id: <20130928154949.8145.16345.reportbug@quail.dasyatidae.internal>
Package: fonts-liberation Version: 2.00.1-1 Severity: normal Using gucharmap 1:3.8.2-2 to view Liberation Serif characters with "Show only glyphs from this font" enabled, the glyph for U+266B BEAMED EIGHTH NOTES shows what is clearly beamed sixteenth notes instead; it should have only one beam rather than two. FontForge confirms this after opening LiberationSerif-Regular.ttf with SHA-256 = ea76595ed32ec4bb117fc715e393b4cca3d42cabe53101baec6bbbeb800fa26a. The glyph for U+266C BEAMED SIXTEENTH NOTES is correct. ---> Drake Wilson -- Package-specific info: Desired=Unknown/Install/Remove/Purge/Hold | Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend |/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad) ||/ Name Version Architecture Description +++-===========================-==================-==================-=========================================================== ii fontconfig 2.10.2-2 amd64 generic font configuration library - support binaries ii libfreetype6:amd64 2.4.9-1.1 amd64 FreeType 2 font engine, shared library files ii libfreetype6:i386 2.4.9-1.1 i386 FreeType 2 font engine, shared library files ii libxft2:amd64 2.3.1-1 amd64 FreeType-based font drawing library for X -- System Information: Debian Release: jessie/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash fonts-liberation depends on no packages. Versions of packages fonts-liberation recommends: pn fonts-liberation-sans-narrow <none> fonts-liberation suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 724839-done@bugs.debian.org
- Cc: 724839-submitter@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: fonts-liberation: U+266B incorrect glyph with extra beam
- From: Francesca Ciceri <madamezou@zouish.org>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2014 13:27:04 +0200
- Message-id: <20140517112703.GC1921@zouish.org>
Version: 1.07.4-1 Hi, this bug has been fixed upstream with release 1.07.3 and so it's now fixed in Debian version 1.07.4-1. I checked and I can confirm the fix. I'm a bit puzzled about the versioning here: apparently upstream uses two different branches (1.07 onward and 2.00) for development. The Debian package in stable/testing/sid is based on the 1.N version, while the 2.N version was used to build the package for experimental. It seems now that only experimental is affected. I'm closing it, considering that experimental is not a "real" release but please feel free to reopen it if my reasoning is not correct. Thanks, Francesca -- "Fuck it! Thank you! I love you all!" Streetlight Manifesto, Point/CounterpointAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---