[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#763597: fonts-droid: conffiles not removed

Package: fonts-droid
Version: 1:4.4.4r2-2
Severity: normal
Usertags: conffile
User: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Usertags: obsolete-conffile adequate

The recent upgrade did not deal with obsolete conffiles properly.
Please use the dpkg-maintscript-helper support provided by dh_installdeb
to remove these obsolete conffiles on upgrade.


This bug report brought to you by adequate:


$ pkg=fonts-droid ; adequate $pkg ; dpkg-query -W -f='${Conffiles}\n' $pkg | grep obsolete
fonts-droid: obsolete-conffile /etc/fonts/conf.avail/65-droid-sans-fonts.conf
 /etc/fonts/conf.avail/65-droid-sans-fonts.conf fd72bca3218e0bd96e83fb21e4d73385 obsolete

-- Package-specific info:
| Status=Not/Inst/Conf-files/Unpacked/halF-conf/Half-inst/trig-aWait/Trig-pend
|/ Err?=(none)/Reinst-required (Status,Err: uppercase=bad)
||/ Name                                     Version                   Architecture              Description
ii  fontconfig                               2.11.0-6.1                amd64                     generic font configuration library - support binaries
ii  libfreetype6:amd64                       2.5.2-2                   amd64                     FreeType 2 font engine, shared library files
ii  libxft2:amd64                            2.3.2-1                   amd64                     FreeType-based font drawing library for X

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (900, 'testing'), (800, 'unstable'), (700, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.16-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages fonts-droid depends on:
ii  dpkg  1.17.13

fonts-droid recommends no packages.

fonts-droid suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: