Quoting Francesca Ciceri (madamezou@zouish.org): > Also, to clarify: so when patches are this trivial it's ok for me to > just commit them directly in the repo if the package is maintained under > the pkg-fonts umbrella? Without asking the main maintainer/uploader? > I really don't want to step on someone else's toes :). If the fonts are in git, they're team-maintained...:-). So, as a team member you're "allowed" to do whatever you think is good. Anyway, commits are mailed to the pkg-fonts-commits mailing list, so any of us can review them. > And another doubt: do I need to add an entry in the changelog each time > I commit a patch (and/or change something) or is this something will be > take care when preparing the next release? > Also: does it make sense to add a changelog entry for such trivial changes? Yes, please. We don't have any automated way, as of now, to generated changelog entries from commit messages. Also, changing debian/changelog with an UNRELEASED entry is a good way to send out the message "there is some pending stuff that's not yet uploaded, in git, for that particular package". I might, in some unknown future, setup something to monitor these and avoid leaving un-uploaded things sleep for ages in git without being uploaded (something I'm doing right now in D-I and works fairly well).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature