Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Packaging Noto fonts
- To: Debian Fonts Task Force <pkg-fonts-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
- Subject: Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Packaging Noto fonts
- From: Vasudev Kamath <kamathvasudev@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2013 22:43:36 +0530
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20130806171336.GD5294@vasudev.homelinux.net>
- Mail-followup-to: Debian Fonts Task Force <pkg-fonts-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <20130628060853.GJ5625@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
- References: <515DA7B1.2040006@behdad.org> <20130404165127.GI13557@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <20130616134501.GA2177@vasudev.homelinux.net> <CAK+NOPVwGHHcWif5hrHoAz6ra5y=Lw6yo0Z_k=N30YPErjUS4Q@mail.gmail.com> <20130626204025.GD5625@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <CAK+NOPWWfxihZW0ERvc_HDyAi4VodSup4p9=vLZ999rKZ=Q1mg@mail.gmail.com> <20130627042350.GE5625@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org> <CAK+NOPWVJnA8S+i3ZmAWLomsovyyVOvrfUbLTPiydXkE=oFm7A@mail.gmail.com> <20130628060853.GJ5625@mykerinos.kheops.frmug.org>
On 08:08 Fri 28 Jun , Christian PERRIER wrote:
> Quoting Vasudev Kamath (kamathvasudev@gmail.com):
>
> > > Anyway, is there a reason for debian/compat to not be 9, by the way?
> >
> > No reasons. If I bump compat to 9 CDBS will generate debhelper
> > dependency on >=9 other than that nothing.
>
>
> My personal stance on this is "use the dh compatibility level that is
> supported in stable". The main rationale is that, doing this way,
> utilities do behave as "modernly" as possible....without /me to care..:-)
>
Done! Sorry for delay please let me know if any further change is
required.
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Reply to: