Am 08.10.2012 02:47, schrieb Norbert Preining:
Ah, now I remember the old story ... thanks for digging out that. Yes, there are problems with that, and AFAIR they have never been resolved. So I guess the best is to either convince gs people to use proper handling of font names, or to keep the fonts separate.
According to [1], ghostscript is currently shipping the pristine set of fonts that they received directly from URW++ in early 2011. They are, however, different (in md5sums) to the ones provided on CTAN.
- Fabian [1] http://ghostscript.com/pipermail/gs-devel/2012-October/009305.html