Quoting Raph Levien (raph.levien@gmail.com): > Yes, the version at Google Web Fonts is more recent and should be > considered the definitive one. > > Note also that there's a bold there now. This will be a significant > advantage to people who have bold styling as part of their syntax > highlighting. > > I really need to update my website but I'm kind of buried in work and other > things right now. Thanks for your answer, Raph. With that information and what followed in further mails, I'll try to build a package with at least the .ttf file and the .sfd source (if I can find my way on the repository) but, certainly, having a disributable tarball (with README, license, OFL-FAQ, etc. and even a Makefile, as Paul Wise suggested) would be great. But, of course, I understand you may run short of time for this. We'll do our best....as often in free software..:-)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature