Quoting Fabian Greffrath (fabian@greffrath.com): > Am 14.05.2012 06:56, schrieb Christian PERRIER: > >There was a point in having all these transition package descriptions > >be the same: not impact the package description translation system and > >add extra stuff to translate (as, obviously, translating these > >description is not a very important thing). This is indeed why I > >always used the same description in all transition packages. > > Oops, sorry. Should I revert this commit? I'd prefer that, yes (not extremely important but adding workload on translators is something I try to avoid myself..:-))
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature