On 10/09/2011 08:20 AM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > I'm balanced when it comes at the package name. First of all, I think > that the source package should be renamed too. The, I'd rather go for > "fonts-libertine". I see nothing "Linux" specific in these fonts, so > even if upstream calls the fonts this way (which is not clear as they > speak about the "Libertine Open Fonts Project"), I think we'd rather > avoid "linux" in the package name. I've also always thought the "linux" in the name was silly/distracting/misleading. Libertine works fine on non-Linux platforms (even on non-free platforms, horrible though they may be :P) and i don't think it makes sense for a font to should show up when searching the archive for "linux". So fonts-libertine is fine by me. I assume this includes biolinum (the sans serif variant) as well. --dkg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature