On 04/12/2011 12:40 PM, Christian PERRIER wrote: > In short, I'm OK with considering *.ttf files as "source" files when > nothing else is available. I think i'm in agreement with Christian here, though i would phrase it differently: I'm OK with considering *.ttf files as "source" files when no other preferred form for modification exists. That is, if the font maker upstream uses something else to generate the .ttf (or .otf, etc) files, then the .ttf is *not* sufficient to satisfy the DFSG. But when upstream just modifies and publishes .ttfs directly, there's no reason for debian to demand another format. --dkg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature