On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 17:31 +0100, Martin Erik Werner wrote: > On Thu, 2011-12-15 at 10:44 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > There is a precompiled Windows binary in the source package: > > > > tools/ttfautohint/ttfautohint002.exe > > > Facepalm! Removed. > > > I note a lot of the tools refer to /usr/local/bin/fontforge, that > > should be changed to using env or /usr/bin/fontforge > > > I've added a patch to fix this. > > > I wonder if the tools should be packaged separately since future > > Google fonts might use them too? Maybe Dave has some advice there. > > > Yes, this is true, and it's on my to-do, I am avoiding it for the first > release however, would I be wrong in doing so? > > > fontlint complaints to forward upstream: > > > > Play-Bold.ttf > > Validation Play-Bold ...Failed > > Self Intersecting Glyph > > > > Play-Regular.ttf > > The glyph named mu is mapped to U+00B5. > > But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+03BC. > > The glyph named Delta is mapped to U+2206. > > But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+0394. > > Validation Play-Regular ...Failed > > Self Intersecting Glyph > > > > Play-Bold.otf > > A point in g is outside the font bounding box data. > > A point in gcircumflex is outside the font bounding box data. > > A point in gbreve is outside the font bounding box data. > > A point in gdotaccent is outside the font bounding box data. > > A point in gcommaaccent is outside the font bounding box data. > > A point in eng is outside the font bounding box data. > > Validation Play-Bold ...Failed > > Self Intersecting Glyph > > Bad 'CFF ' table > > > > Play-Regular.otf > > The glyph named mu is mapped to U+00B5. > > But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+03BC. > > The glyph named Delta is mapped to U+2206. > > But its name indicates it should be mapped to U+0394. > > A point in scedilla is outside the font bounding box data. > > A point in perthousand.smcp is outside the font bounding box data. > > Validation Play-Regular ...Failed > > Self Intersecting Glyph > > Bad 'CFF ' table > > > Right, will do. > > > Relevant lintian complaints: > > > > P: fonts-play source: source-contains-prebuilt-windows-binary > > tools/ttfautohint/ttfautohint002.exe > > P: fonts-play source: unversioned-copyright-format-uri > > http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep5 > Until the proposed versioned address has been finalised, I consider it > the friendliest compromise. But I may be wrong in this? > > > I: fonts-play source: debian-watch-file-is-missing > No good way that I can see to watch a mercurial repo, archives for > download have been suggested upstream, but those would be of the whole > directory and not relevant to looking for new versions of a specific > font anyways. > > > P: fonts-play: no-upstream-changelog > Should I be generating this from the revision history? > > > P: fonts-play: data.tar.xz-member-without-dpkg-pre-depends > > > I've fixed this, is there anything more that would need doing for Ubuntu > in this, or is adding the pre-depends enough? > > I'm not subscribed to the lists, so do CC me. I have uploaded new versions to debexpo/mentors: http://mentors.debian.net/package/fonts-play dget -x http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/f/fonts-play/fonts-play_1.002 +20111215.1-1.dsc ..and to git: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-fonts/fonts-play.git;a=tree git clone git://git.debian.org/pkg-fonts/fonts-play.git I've tagged the RFS uploads for easy comparison: git diff debian/1.002+20111214.1-1_RFS1..debian/1.002 +20111214.1-1_RFS2 Not subscribed, please CC. Thanks, -- Martin Erik Werner <martinerikwerner@gmail.com>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part