Quoting Rogério Brito (rbrito@ime.usp.br): > > However, we may discuss whether it should be "fonts-anonymous-pro" or > > "fonts-anonymouspro". The latter makes it clearer that "anonymous" is > > not a foundry name..:-) > > I think that a middle ground between "no foundries" and "with foundries" is to > adopt the following position: > > 1 - just "say no to foundries" > 2 - since we don't have foundries, in case a foundry should be credited or to > avoid disabiguation, just incorporate the name of the foundry in the name of the > font and regard *that* as the name of the font. So, the policy would be: fonts-fontname and "fontname" can optionnally include the foundry name if that is judged as needed to disambiguate the name...or whatever other reason. Others in the fotn team? Opinions?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature