I see that Yamane-san is now going the way to move the font packages he's maintaining to the "new" packages naming "policy". This is good as I think we reached some kind of consensus with last proposals, assuming the "foundry" part is considered to be optional. So, it would probably be good to have some nice short and straightforward cooking recipe for those of us who want to migrate some team-maintained font packages to the new naming scheme. Hideki, do you think you could write down something about the process you followed for packages you worked on already? Maybe that was among your intents and, if so, please forgive me..:-) but, definitely, that would help, at least /me, for the day I'll sit down and start hunting the few dozen packages we already have under our "control" (but often with loose maintenance). We probably don't need a nicely reviewed documentation, just a small cook book. Japglish will be a perfect language for the documentation and I might improve it later on with some Frenglish (I noticed that Japglish, Frenglish, Portuglish and Spanglish are often very well mutually intelligible, though sometimes difficult to cope with for Oxford English speakers). --
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature