Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] The 0-th (very) rough (and incomplete) draft of a Font Policy
2011-03-27 (일), 09:52 +0200, Christian PERRIER:
> Quoting Rogério Brito (firstname.lastname@example.org):
> > * The definition of what a font foundry is.
> Yeah, that's somehow tricky.
> I would go for making the foundry optional and let this top the
> package maintainer, or the person proposing the ITP to mention it or
> not in the package name.
How about making the exceptions clear, based on the Fedora fonts policy:
The foundryname- prefix can optionally be skipped:
- for entities that never released more than one font family, or
- when the font project and the publishing entity are one and the same.
Changwoo Ryu <email@example.com>