Quoting Daniel Kahn Gillmor (dkg@fifthhorseman.net): > I also think this is a good idea, and will try to address it when i > bring ttf-fifthhorseman-dkg-handwriting into compliance with the latest > fonts policy. But i think the build-dep should be 'fontforge-nox | > fontforge', and not the other way around. won't the buildds > preferentially satisfy disjunctive dependencies in the order listed? There are high chances that you're right..:-) BTW, if you think about aligning the font package with the (yet to be written) font policy, then you might want to rename it to fonts-foobar. I think we should do our best to have this package renaming transition happening during squeeze->wheezy.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature