[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#568662: marked as done (ttf-oldstandard Recommends: fontforge)



Your message dated Sun, 07 Feb 2010 13:33:20 +0000
with message-id <E1Ne7GK-0002Wo-0l@ries.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#568662: fixed in ttf-oldstandard 2.2-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #568662,
regarding ttf-oldstandard Recommends: fontforge
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
568662: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=568662
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: ttf-oldstandard
Version: 2.2-1
Severity: minor

Hi,

Trying to install ttf-oldstandard, I find it pulls in fontforge.

Is fontforge really used in all but unusual installations of this
font?  If so, the package description should explain how.

Thoughts?
Jonathan



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Source: ttf-oldstandard
Source-Version: 2.2-2

We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
ttf-oldstandard, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:

ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2.debian.tar.gz
  to main/t/ttf-oldstandard/ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2.debian.tar.gz
ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2.dsc
  to main/t/ttf-oldstandard/ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2.dsc
ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2_all.deb
  to main/t/ttf-oldstandard/ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2_all.deb



A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.

Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed.  If you
have further comments please address them to 568662@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.

Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org> (supplier of updated ttf-oldstandard package)

(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2010 12:39:06 +0100
Source: ttf-oldstandard
Binary: ttf-oldstandard
Architecture: source all
Version: 2.2-2
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Fonts Task Force <pkg-fonts-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christian Perrier <bubulle@debian.org>
Description: 
 ttf-oldstandard - smart font with wide range of Latin, Greek and Cyrillic character
Closes: 568662
Changes: 
 ttf-oldstandard (2.2-2) unstable; urgency=low
 .
   * Drop fontforge from Recommends. Closes: #568662
   * Drop fontconfig from Depends.
   * Update Standards to 3.8.4 (checked, no change)
Checksums-Sha1: 
 28beda2bf182c113dd2b719db6b70b204487e136 1400 ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2.dsc
 c8d24c6e114094c46621a9e0b6973b3fe07d180a 5226 ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2.debian.tar.gz
 7f706cc3f755e22abae26bc9e4fa125dfc5e8423 447518 ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2_all.deb
Checksums-Sha256: 
 b62fda303d1e569050ce272ee3321ca59ae705e4946a911e34b2534bc7e8ef4a 1400 ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2.dsc
 92712635dddbcaac63287090cad7876aa66beb3a3945f5956fa6b82582f9448c 5226 ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2.debian.tar.gz
 2b413200c049ace60c0df0bd4cb6928a72b9f222da4fe40b36fbefcb28695f6d 447518 ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2_all.deb
Files: 
 2ae4b740b82a6a005513a295262c30c7 1400 fonts optional ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2.dsc
 b2dec914791cf07471a4ce99ad20a3dd 5226 fonts optional ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2.debian.tar.gz
 ac3ec45c443cfdbaa202cd7bf47120a6 447518 fonts optional ttf-oldstandard_2.2-2_all.deb

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFLbrx+1OXtrMAUPS0RAltkAJ9CrmNWwAnc+APiUqAxyV1yuLMeOgCeIDyo
uyhn8S7OJfUwxZLSOwg1Biw=
=voUC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



--- End Message ---

Reply to: