[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-fonts-devel] About to revert r1285 - packages/ttf-dzongkha/trunk



Quoting Nicolas Spalinger (yosch-guest@alioth.debian.org):
> Author: yosch-guest
> Date: 2009-11-20 12:29:02 +0000 (Fri, 20 Nov 2009)
> New Revision: 1285
> 
> Modified:
>    packages/ttf-dzongkha/trunk/FONTLOG.txt
> Log:
> Drop leftover mention of other open font (probably tiny copy/paste buglet taken from template)
> 
> 
> Modified: packages/ttf-dzongkha/trunk/FONTLOG.txt
> ===================================================================
> --- packages/ttf-dzongkha/trunk/FONTLOG.txt	2009-11-20 07:13:07 UTC (rev 1284)
> +++ packages/ttf-dzongkha/trunk/FONTLOG.txt	2009-11-20 12:29:02 UTC (rev 1285)
> @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
>  FONTLOG
> -Gentium font family
>  ========================
>  
>  This file provides detailed information on the Jomolhari of font. This


I disagree with that change. Even though upstream is clearly slightly
incorrect, we should not change upstream files this way.

Eventually, we can add a patch in debian/patches in order to patch
upstream file, but the file should remain unchanged in the repository
and in the .orig.tar.gz file.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: