Christian Perrier wrote: > Quoting Nicolas Spalinger (nicolas_spalinger@sil.org): > >> As a quick note, I'd recommend also taking advantage of the update to >> double-check and adjust the metadata as shown on our current review: >> http://pkg-fonts.alioth.debian.org/review/fnt-75f85d518458d8846ffd35cbc1e16adc.html >> >> Looks like Description, Designer URL and License Description need to be >> adjusted to reflect the intent of the upstream. >> >> And is the font still in alpha? IMHO the version number should reflect >> the status. >> >> There are also specimens on the upstream site which might usefully be >> included in the package. > > > I agree. However, I think all this belongs to Chris, in a possible new > version (that, indeed, could be numbered 1.0). You are right, sorry if I was unclear but my suggestion was to take advantage of this interaction with Chris as the upstream author to respectfully ask for these updates as part of a new release. For the specimens hopefully we will soon be able to generate specimen for non-roman scripts in our weekly review. But IMHO it's still useful to have specimens in the package itself. Thanks, -- Nicolas Spalinger, NRSI volunteer Debian/Ubuntu font teams / OpenFontLibrary http://planet.open-fonts.org
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature