[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#551507: ttf-dzongkha: Hints point to Jomolhari.ttf, not Jomolhari-alpha3c-0605331.ttf

Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Nicolas Spalinger (nicolas_spalinger@sil.org):
>> As a quick note, I'd recommend also taking advantage of the update to
>> double-check and adjust the metadata as shown on our current review:
>> http://pkg-fonts.alioth.debian.org/review/fnt-75f85d518458d8846ffd35cbc1e16adc.html
>> Looks like Description, Designer URL and License Description need to be
>> adjusted to reflect the intent of the upstream.
>> And is the font still in alpha? IMHO the version number should reflect
>> the status.
>> There are also specimens on the upstream site which might usefully be
>> included in the package.
> I agree. However, I think all this belongs to Chris, in a possible new
> version (that, indeed, could be numbered 1.0).

You are right, sorry if I was unclear but my suggestion was to take
advantage of this interaction with Chris as the upstream author to
respectfully ask for these updates as part of a new release.

For the specimens hopefully we will soon be able to generate specimen
for non-roman scripts in our weekly review. But IMHO it's still useful
to have specimens in the package itself.


Nicolas Spalinger, NRSI volunteer
Debian/Ubuntu font teams / OpenFontLibrary

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: