Hi, all changes necessary to package new freefont were committed to svn and are available in [1]. In [2] I've put the both the deb and udeb files and the images produced with them (deb_hi.png and udeb_hi.png). As you can see in hi_diff.png images differ... hi.txt is the text file I use to render the pngs. If anything were not clear do not hesitate to ask Davide [1] svn://svn.debian.org/pkg-fonts/packages/ttf-freefont/trunk/debian [2] http://alioth.debian.org/~zinosat-guest/freefont-pb/ On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 01:16:26PM +0800, Arne Goetje wrote: > Davide Viti wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > I've worked on the new package since its release and I'm currently stuck with a problem: > > one of the "products" of the build, is an "udeb" package meant to be used by the Debian > > graphical installer: it consists of a ttf files with a stripped down set of glyphs. > > The stripped down ttfs are created via a fontforge script. > > > > To make sure the udeb is fine, i render some text with the standard ttf, then I render > > the same text with the stripped ttf and compare the two images, expecting no differences. > > > > This test fails, for example for Bengali, Gujarati and Hindi languages, which are supported > > by te udeb: this means that one of that removed glyph ranges causes the problem, but haven't > > figured out yet with one. > > do you have the source somewhere so that I can take a look? > > Thanks > Arne > -- > Arne Götje (高盛華) <arne@linux.org.tw> > PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/685D1E8C > Fingerprint: 2056 F6B7 DEA8 B478 311F 1C34 6E9F D06E 685D 1E8C > Key available at wwwkeys.pgp.net. Encrypted e-mail preferred. > > > > _______________________________________________ > Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list > Pkg-fonts-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-fonts-devel
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature