Quoting Nicolas Spalinger (nicolas_spalinger@sil.org): > And yes, I'm probably not going to stay with cdbs. (Pantelis' package > was originally cdbs-based). ...which is why I'm laughing. cdbs makes the creation of simple packages (and font packages are simple ones, most of the time) much easier and straightforward. It also allows complying with most of the good practices without changes to each single package. So, as long as cdbs is well maintained, I see no reason to not use it in simple packages. But, well, that's your call if you prefer handling each debian/rules line manually....
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature