Hi, On Sun, Mar 30, 2008 at 06:46:06AM -0800, George Williams wrote: > On Sun, 2008-03-30 at 03:15, Steve White wrote: > > I don't see in the SFD files a record of the date of the FontForge > > that created them. If there were such a field, FontForge could check > > that date, and go on to report to the user that in fact the SFD file > > was made by a more recent version. > A date is present (CreationTime/ModificationTime) but is not what you > need. A fontforge version number would be what you'd need. Actually it > should be an sfd version number. Unfortunately, when I made the change I > did not realize it was incompatible and I did not bump the version > number. > > And I think it is too late to do so now. > I took a look at the Sourceforge page containing the fontforge sources, and noticed that the sources dated 20080302 are available in a "fontforge_full-20080309.tar.bz2", whereas the docs are available in a "fontforge_htdocs-20080302.tar.bz2": was it done on purpose or was it just a typo? regards, Davide
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature