21 червня 2007 о 17:51 +0200 Nicolas Spalinger написав(-ла): > > >>> * I don't think fontforge, fontforge-doc, fonttools need to be in > >>> the suggests line. > >> Why? > > > > IMO because they aren't needed by most users of the package. > > I see, but the intent is that many "users" are going to be designers who > would want to know what tools are suggested for that package. > > IMHO this is useful information for a section of the audience and > information easily ignored by other users. > > Same things as with debtags, not everybody is interested in all the > various "facets" but it helps some people make the most of the package. > > What do others think? > We do not suggest gcc and other tools in each package that written in C, so I think fontforge should not be suggested too. > > >>> * The OFL file doesn't need to be installed > >> Why? > > > > The OFL is quoted in the copyright file, IMO we don't need 2 copies of > > the OFL in the package. > > OK, that makes sense. But we will need to make many changes to various > existing packages which reference OFL.txt Alternatively if OFL is used by many packages it can be added to base-files in directory /usr/share/common-licenses, so it need not to be included in debian/copyright.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature