Hi, Jon, Victor Gaultney's investigation of this font, as reported in an earlier email, clearly shows that this font contains exact copies of other people's glyphs where the permission for such copying is not clear at all. To me, that suggests this font is a legal can of worms that you should not be so quick to jump on. If OFLB decides to use it, OFLB will have to investigate every single glyph, and will have to cut out all of those where permission for use cannot be obtained. That might be a lot of glyphs. - Ed On 2/11/07, Jon Phillips <jon@rejon.org> wrote:
Sure, we could host it as part of Open Font Library so we can all make revisions, derivatives, etc. Would that interest you all? This will help our community as well to get sorted with packaging and some other features... Jon