All'incirca Sun, 16 Dec 2007 23:28:34 +0100, Nicolas Spalinger <nicolas_spalinger@sil.org> sembrerebbe aver scritto: > But the key issue is: > > - looking at the trademark/branding aspects and what it means for > this font because it is the visual identity of a family of products. > AFAIK some variations are allowed for LoCos (Local Ubuntu > communities). I can't understand this fully: this font is distributed under GPL 2 or later, so what's the point in redistributing it? Anyway, I agree with you about merging glyphs from other branches of the font. > BTW, on the Debian side, we still have to resolve the problem of > using a non-free font for our logo. Oh, the irony :( Douch, I didn't know about this... :-( > I've been in touch with the upstream designer of Ubuntu-title and > other people in the Ubuntu community around fonts and I will mail > them about this again. So I guess the best is to wait and see. So, I'll wait. Let me know, I'll be happy to give my modest contribution, if I can! Kind regards, Giovanni. (keep on Cc:-ing me, please) -- Giovanni Mascellani <g.mascellani@gmail.com> Pisa, Italy Web: http://giomasce.altervista.org SIP: g.mascellani@ekiga.net Jabber: g.mascellani@jabber.org / giovanni@elabor.homelinux.org GPG: 0x5F1FBF70 (FP: 1EB6 3D43 E201 4DDF 67BD 003F FCB0 BB5C 5F1F BF70)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature