[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] RFC: how to name alternative font package?



On 01/07/07, Arne Goetje <arne@linux.org.tw> wrote:
Dave Crossland wrote:
> On 29/06/07, Denis Jacquerye <moyogo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 6/29/07, Eugeniy Meshcheryakov <eugen@debian.org> wrote:
>>> 29 червня 2007 о 16:46 +0800 "Arne Götje (高盛華)" написав(-ла):
>>>> ttc-$foundry-$font ?
>>> looks good for me.
>> I don't think it's necessary to use the prefix ttc- since TTC is just
>> collection of TTF files, the prefix ttf- is also adequate.
>
> I agree - when users search APT for fonts, they will not know to
> search for ttc-* packages, but ttf-* is more obvious.

Well, the point is, that the ttf-arphic-{ukai|uming} packages exist
already and will contain the old style ttf fonts.

Perhaps ttfc-$foundry-$font as that will still be found in searches for TTF?

--
Regards,
Dave

Reply to: