(sorry for crossposting again while I'm not subscribed to ubuntu* lists...you guys might want to whitelist me..:-)) > font design (inkscape, fontforge, fonts:ttf), do we still need DeFoMa's > approach? Is DeFoMa really maintained? To this very question, I would answer "no", at least by reading its changelog. I'd be happy to be proven wrong -- Thomas Huriaux <thomas.huriaux@gmail.com> Sat, 3 Feb 2007 11:19:08 +0100 -- Angus Lees <gus@debian.org> Thu, 6 Jul 2006 21:55:55 +0100 -- Angus Lees <gus@debian.org> Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:29:34 +0100 -- Frank Lichtenheld <djpig@debian.org> Sat, 21 Aug 2004 19:27:43 +0200 -- Angus Lees <gus@debian.org> Tue, 25 May 2004 20:45:29 +1000 -- Angus Lees <angus.lees@urnet.com.au> Tue, 27 Jan 2004 13:44:53 +1100 -- Angus Lees <gus@debian.org> Sat, 3 Jan 2004 12:16:04 +1100 -- Angus Lees <gus@debian.org> Sun, 21 Sep 2003 13:26:56 +1000 -- Angus Lees <gus@debian.org> Wed, 13 Aug 2003 09:50:44 +1000 -- Angus Lees <gus@debian.org> Sun, 15 Jun 2003 15:02:50 +1000 -- Angus Lees <gus@debian.org> Sun, 15 Jun 2003 13:24:33 +1000 -- Yasuhiro Take <take@debian.org> Sat, 11 May 2002 00:23:53 +0900 -- Yasuhiro Take <take@debian.org> Tue, 16 Apr 2002 13:09:35 +0900
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature