On Tue, 2006-06-13 at 16:49 +0200, Ralf Stubner wrote: > On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 10:48 +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > > > > Full copyright info is: > > > > Copyright (URW)++,Copyright 1999 by (URW)++ Design & Development; > > Cyrillic glyphs added by Valek Filippov (C) 2001-2002 > > > > Looks like it is pretty conclusively the GhostPCL version. nimbus.ttf is > > the same. > > No. Unless somebody put a lot of effort into this, the above copyright > info indicates that this TTF has been converted from a Type1 font which > originates from GhostScript. The fonts that can be found in the gsfonts > package carry the same copyright info. Ok, so the copyright on that is fine, apart from not being listed in the debian/copyright file. > > verdana.ttf and vera.ttf in the same package seem to be > > Bitstream Vera Sans version "Release 1.10", copyright info: > > > > Copyright (c) 2003 by Bitstream, Inc. All Rights Reserved. > > Why has anybody ever created 'ttf-bitstream-vera' ...? indeed :) > > Are you interested in filing a bug about this, since you seem to know > > about the situation? If not, I can do so on the weekend using > > information you have provided thus far. > > I am not sure if I would have the time to look after it. It might be > better if you do this. OK, I'll file separate bugs about the "including fonts in the package" and the "copyright file doesn't list font copyrights" on the weekend. -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part