Re: iptables script review
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Dave Ewart wrote:
>On Monday, 25.07.2005 at 16:27 +1200, Adam Bogacki wrote:
>>>Well, that looks wrong for a start. The IP addresses and ranges on your
>>>INET interface and LAN interface overlap, which is Bad and Wrong. The
>>>broadcast address is also spurious.
>>>What IP addresses and net-masks are actually allocated to eth0 and eth1?
>>>Perhaps show us the output of 'ifconfig'?
>>Output of 'ifconfig' below.
>Adam, please reply on list, do not CC people on list messages.
>>eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:CC:D9:E2:48
>> inet addr:18.104.22.168 Bcast:22.214.171.124
>Well - there you are. Above is your eth0 IP address. You should
>correct your script to include 126.96.36.199 as your eth0 address and,
>as seen below, eth1 is 192.168.0.1 ...
>>eth1 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:A0:CC:D9:C7:6F
>> inet addr:192.168.0.1 Bcast:192.168.0.255 Mask:255.255.255.0
Apologies, I've picked up bad habits from other lists.
Iptables now allows me to connect to the internet and do debian things
and I feel a bit more secure.
still make sense ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----