Re: NAT iptables routing issue

[Daniel Pittman <daniel@rimspace.net>]

On 9 Jul 2004, Andrew Porter wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-07-08 at 14:46, Daniel Pittman wrote:
>
>> If you can't, or don't want to, do that, then you need to make sure the
>> packet goes through the firewall in both directions, so you need to SNAT
>> any packet from an internal address to the public IP, so that the packet
>> is returned to the firewall.
>
> Would it be more sensible to SNAT it to the internal address of the
> firewall machine ?

Dang. Yes, it would make sense to do that, and that is what I intended
to say there.  Sorry for any confusion.

   Daniel

-- 
The gods confound the man who first found out how to distinguish the hours!
Confound him, too, who in this place set up a sundial, to cut and hack
my day so wretchedly into small pieces!
        -- Plautus