[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

RE: Iptables can't close port 25 and 110




-----Original Message-----
From: "Ronald Laarman" <ronald@laarman.xs4all.nl>
To: <debian-firewall@lists.debian.org>
Cc: <R.DElia@starcomitalia.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2004 16:35:05 +0100
Subject: RE: Iptables can't close port 25 and 110

> I can't connect using telnet, It just prompt me to press any key and
> disconnects.

mmh Have you flushed also the nat and the mangle tables? I'm thinking 
about a redirect. If the syn packet sent to the port 25 is redirected to 
another port nmap cannot know it: it tells "port 25 open"

do you have tcpdump or a similar tool installed? i think we have to see 
what's happening!


> 
> But this just doesn't feel right, this server is about to go live and I
> want to sleep at night ;)
> 
I agree...

Radel

**************************************************************************
Questo messaggio puo' contenere informazioni di carattere estremamente
riservato e confidenziale.
Qualora non foste i destinatari, vogliate immediatamente informarci
con lo stesso mezzo ed eliminare il messaggio, con gli eventuali allegati,
senza trattenerne copia. Qualsivoglia utilizzo non autorizzato del
contenuto di questo messaggio costituisce violazione dell'obbligo di non
prendere cognizione della corrispondenza tra altri soggetti, salvo piu'
grave illecito, ed espone il responsabile alle relative conseguenze civili
e penali.

This message is being sent from Starcom Italia Srl and may
contain information which is confidential or privileged.  If you are not
the intended recipient, please advise the sender immediately by reply
e-mail and delete this message and any attachments without retaining a
copy. Any unauthorized use of the content of this message is a breach of
your duty to respect the confidentiality of the correspondence between
other persons and can expose the responsible party to civil and/or
criminal penalties, and may constitute a more serious offense.
**************************************************************************




Reply to: