[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: two networks sharing one router



You could also replace Rou1 and Rou2 in your diagram with a single
router with multiple NICs, no?

And as long as you're doing that, you almost may as well use 3 NICs and
dump the DSL router -- making this a relatively standard firewall
setup...

-hp3

On Thu, 2003-10-09 at 10:21, Volker Tanger wrote:
> Greetings!
> 
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2003 17:25:46 +0300 "M. Civan CAMKIRAN" <civan@ads.com.tr>
> wrote:
> 
> > I have two networks which belong to two different companies in a
> > building and one broadband internet connection. I decided to buy an
> > inexpensive 4 port router and plug each hub to 2 of the 4 ports on
> > this router. Questions are:
> 
> Please define "inexpensive 4port router":
> 
> - a cheap (DSL) router with builtin 4port switch/hub, thus effectively
>   only a 2port router with the second port multiplied by an internal
>   hub/switch (usually in the $50+ range)
> 
> - a router with 4 full/independent LAN/WAN interfaces (e.g. Cisco 26xx,
>   usually above $1000)
> 
> 
> > 1. Is it possible to have both networks use the same internet
> > connection in this way?
> 
> Yes - but usually the cheap DSL routers don't allow multiple independent
> networks on the inside interface/hub.
> 
> 
> > 2. Is it possible to prevent the computers see the other network's
> > computers? If yes, how?
> 
> Full router: yes, just set the proper ACLs.
> DSL router with hub/switch: no
> 
> Depending on your brand, cheap broadband routers MIGHT be able
> (depending on built-in options) to do just routing ethernet/ethernet. If
> so, you'd need two more routers, each one hiding the individual company
> network, then connecting to the common DSL router. ASCII art below:
> 
> 
>       WWW
>        |
>        |
>    DSLrouter
>    |       |
>    |       |
>  Rou1     Rou2
>    |       |
>    |       |
>  --+--   --+--
>   LAN1    LAN2
> 
> 
> You'd be probably better/cheaper off with a multiport (!) DSL-enabled
> firewall...
> 
> Good luck!
> 
> Volker Tanger
> 



Reply to: