[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: IPMasqing firewall with a Windows client problem



Quoting "Matthew H. Ray" <mray@coral-tech.com>:

> The problem is that my wife's windows box will make external
> connections
> but won't finish downloading anything but the smallest pages.  It also
> seems to timeout on network connections on the intranet.  The odd
> thing
> is that there is a dual-boot Linux/Windows machine that is having no
> problems whatsoever also on the network.  The windows box in question
> gets a proper ip address from DHCP and can ping other boxes and
> external
> hosts.  Pings from the other machines on the network to the windows
> box
> are ok, but occasionally packets get dropped.  If the machine is put
> on
> a direct connection to the internet, it has no problems.
> 
> The firewall is a Debian 2.2 fresh install with a custom built kernel
> connected to a DSL line.  It is running the ipmasq .deb, samba  and
> providing dhcp to the internal network.  Portsentry is monitoring
> incoming connections, but I've checked /etc/hosts.deny and there's
> nothing there
> that shouldn't be.
> 
> I've tested the cables, switched the hub connections, switched out
> network cards and reinstalled the drivers on the windows box several
> times.
> 
> Anyone want to take a shot at solving this one?
> 
> Thanks, 
> Matt Ray
> slack@linuxfreak.com
> 
> 

Matt,

This sounds exactly like a problem I was seeing on one of my Win98 boxen inside 
my Debian firewall network here at home.  I fixed my problem by reinstalling 
Win98 on the broken machine.  The problem had noting to do with my most 
excellent firewall.  I proved this to myself by using a second Win98 box and 
making good downloads, (also my Debian boxen were seeing no problems).  I 
suspect that the intoduction of Netscape with their download manager and then 
the de-install of that download manager broke my Win box.  Perhaps I could have 
fixed the Win98 box, but I did not try to hard.

Good luck,

-- Bill
C.R.E.A.M.  Dark Angel



Reply to: