Re: 2.2.19 ipmaqs and private lans
- To: debian-firewall@lists.debian.org
- Subject: Re: 2.2.19 ipmaqs and private lans
- From: Jakub Ambrożewicz <ja@vigor.com.pl>
- Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 15:00:48 +0200
- Message-id: <9p1s9k$55k$1@news.tpi.pl>
- References: <9p192b$fuk$1@news.tpi.pl> <01092813332701.00454@planck>
Użytkownik "Pedro Corte-Real" <typo@netcabo.pt> napisał w wiadomości
news:01092813332701.00454@planck...
> On Friday 28 September 2001 08:32, Jakub Ambrożewicz wrote:
> > Here is the situation
> >
> > Private ----------- Debian --------- ISP
> > LAN eth1 eth0
> >
> > Simple and clear. I used ipmasq package to do the job.
> > And it worked perfectly with 192.168.0.0/24 network for
> > private lan. Then i switched private network to 10.0.0.0/24
> > and suddenly it stopped working. Not whole network, but
> > masquerading only. I still can ping from debian in both
> > ways. I can even ping external interface from my internal
> > network. But i cant reach anything further. Packets aren't
> > denied and logged. They are simply gone.
> > I set up simple masquerading with no firewall rules at all
> > with default ACCEPT on all interfaces and again it works
> > for 192... and does not for 10... Even simple forwarding
> > fails for 10...
> > I tried it on potato box (i386) and woody box (celeron)
> > effects are the same.
> >
>
> Are you sure you set up the masquerading rule for the 10.0.0.0/24
adresses?
> 10.0.0.0/24 is 10.0.0.1-10.0.0.255, are these the adresses you're
using?
>
> Pedro.
Yes. I used 10.0.0.1/255.255.255.0 as eth1
And i couldn't forward or masquerade them
JA
Reply to: