Re: netstat -M for SNAT/DNAT
Yes, that may work, but I'd rather have a lesser netstat, and use iptables than vica versa. IMHO I'm finding iptables a little easier to understand rather than ipchains(+ ipmasqadm).
I think I'll try the /proc/net/ip_connect... suggestion on monday.
Thanks.
Cory
On Sat, Feb 24, 2001 at 02:58:50PM -0500, Jim Crilly wrote:
> > You should have read Cory's email more carefully. He was asking about
> > netstat showing masq'ed connections under 2.4 w/ iptables, and not 2.2.
> > He was also asking about the unstable/sid version of netstat, not the
> > version of netstat in stable/potato.
>
> Sorry, you're right.
>
> I also made the assumption that if the stable/potato version had the ability
> the unstable/sid version would too.
>
> If Cory had ipchains compatibility compiled in would that allow netstat -M to
> work as if he was using ipchains? A temporary work around until netstat gets
> updated?
>
> >
> > --
> > Salman Ahmed
> > ssahmed AT pathcom DOT com
> >
> >
> > --
> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-firewall-request@lists.debian.org
> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> >
> >
> >
>
> --
> Help protect your rights on-line.
> Join the Electronic Frontiers Foundation today: http://www.eff.org/join
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
> the death of one is a tragedy, the death of millions is just a statistic
>
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-firewall-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: