Accepted libreoffice 4:7.5.5~rc1-2 (source) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2023 16:47:26 +0200
Source: libreoffice
Architecture: source
Version: 4:7.5.5~rc1-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian LibreOffice Maintainers <debian-openoffice@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Rene Engelhard <rene@debian.org>
Changes:
libreoffice (4:7.5.5~rc1-2) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* debian/rules:
- actually enable cppunit also in the testtools/smoketest-only case
- build some smoketest pre-requisites ourselves since they are not built
even with module.allcheck (or .allbuild)
in smoketest afterwards
- build-depend on libcppunit-dev on all archs
- clean up some make-check-only Build-Depends(-Arch)
- also run the tests in pyuno since shipping a python3-uno which doesn't
work is also bad
* debian/rules, debian/tests/smoketest: run smoketest using make
subsquentcheck in smoketest
Checksums-Sha1:
27530bbfdaf0090a51628bfe3857e6d895e09102 35578 libreoffice_7.5.5~rc1-2.dsc
05431e5c0d742fb6d84a9a7109a2af886c1a2268 24502416 libreoffice_7.5.5~rc1-2.debian.tar.xz
f5e6200a172910a69996c1f783f236cf5fea3cdd 35480 libreoffice_7.5.5~rc1-2_source.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
5881d32998102701a529d16b429769f886062d975d4d9d410b29c82214b9b0e7 35578 libreoffice_7.5.5~rc1-2.dsc
ce0525fa305fd13081442f3ebf69adb862d0cb3b5a922b7cf8db1d5fc072af80 24502416 libreoffice_7.5.5~rc1-2.debian.tar.xz
f438c6a91051dd6717eff4c63e5d342e4f0cb14e08ac070f5f2cfc4dbdffd129 35480 libreoffice_7.5.5~rc1-2_source.buildinfo
Files:
9c8f3d4f25cd332ade62981995115892 35578 editors optional libreoffice_7.5.5~rc1-2.dsc
fd9a6dd8303ced9f24363256ab469439 24502416 editors optional libreoffice_7.5.5~rc1-2.debian.tar.xz
2207f899a754585076e49c39f43ada07 35480 editors optional libreoffice_7.5.5~rc1-2_source.buildinfo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=5qpJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: