Accepted exim4 4.96~RC1-1 (source) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 21 May 2022 13:09:06 +0200
Source: exim4
Architecture: source
Version: 4.96~RC1-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Exim4 Maintainers <pkg-exim4-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Andreas Metzler <ametzler@debian.org>
Closes: 1004740
Changes:
exim4 (4.96~RC1-1) experimental; urgency=low
.
* Merge 4.95-6:
75_68-GnuTLS-Do-not-free-the-cached-creds-on-transport-con.patch:
Fix segfault on deferred delivery on first MX. Closes: #1004740
(Huge thanks to Gedalya for finding/setting up a reproducer and taking
this upstream.)
* New upstream version.
* Pull 75_69-ARC-reset-headers-before-signing-for-secondary-MX.-B.patch to
fix a crash when built against libarc.
Checksums-Sha1:
27cf0daab1c2d2b9b96618066f15d0ed61f24b89 2929 exim4_4.96~RC1-1.dsc
024e917a4014df931e7d68bc100f9a199c70ea41 1878712 exim4_4.96~RC1.orig.tar.xz
ec974ff1174a073f8565698de51da4697fc57e22 508 exim4_4.96~RC1.orig.tar.xz.asc
2c99e2217a9a81b3b05af884c99be34fc0960e29 466912 exim4_4.96~RC1-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
6f9f0c553ce41eabf70c0e3b93ff8d14ac16abccb6d42601d408c778e0b961e0 2929 exim4_4.96~RC1-1.dsc
1f1d49298545f00c46557f8ed400e60c673c003159c8767c392af2ad66effc99 1878712 exim4_4.96~RC1.orig.tar.xz
c731536db132f9a8467a932cc26b707f2b67febe36f9084a174d9a0a773334ce 508 exim4_4.96~RC1.orig.tar.xz.asc
6379040790a87a6be0c60ed857dd10e7409614a8d4b4f0b7fec746b02f674bec 466912 exim4_4.96~RC1-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
1645c229e3620d2c4931fd6523216b01 2929 mail standard exim4_4.96~RC1-1.dsc
9d87c6c24d760db97d10c63064a9e9dc 1878712 mail standard exim4_4.96~RC1.orig.tar.xz
f46237abc97139b855c49dd7f33b8b59 508 mail standard exim4_4.96~RC1.orig.tar.xz.asc
5cfe802b7dc3bb3825dbeb856c06a612 466912 mail standard exim4_4.96~RC1-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEE0uCSA5741Jbt9PpepU8BhUOCFIQFAmKIyS8ACgkQpU8BhUOC
FIQ/vw/9GPJgL5PK3AlO6U+fIwAnZtYr38SLc6IS5ATLBusBZpd8WzhaCGDrQX9Y
7zgZqMFFZGoUuaF1zEtTzQrLgzXInhGrFlkHkdCwO7WNcO+l5UXe9LJ61tL4ivPb
bTjd4BJBkLOqskzOVfWgLfeplgxhCwx3wNWKsjkR5+JLMEetnJ/U18F4f4NiU1hS
bU12ZusLUE1H+Sr4nCi76Fpe4vef6B+gR4mb98XIcPlawOWJfoKioTsYieogfQzd
s1pHv3IJmEu6WCidlyowQraYOzhoKFiYTvxZtzewKPpGoU8cQukRt39vQlKM2Q4A
Z0AHnXkBplKdmohBjc63S7RgFu0FHAGn7VArTSsRpY8M8e/hNAj4DkIZ2KgLavAt
D582ACUd7xIXGUMQiZGvPDD8Iouui9VyvXSVhFMBO+xxZWMX/KqaBu3Ktidnj3ut
w6wpq/2CgBHnKV3WWfGmtAuRWeisz0wshfP5s+q7fTTymcJnFDUjTErwR/yyjr7R
KjPMwd5cJ45jtjPDNqcXTix3RuE/KsFwedvocNRezO2bctQS4P/Fdt47QPu1YX05
3Z+UDdRsIolrPf6rNzbM9KAl7OtDszEswGNuLaIH5ZFqv04O8mza+lxQIMGf8IMT
iqBiRujJxcPhED/ywsnbgPuPjCyHpKfDecMgKS+bHPatjYSlYK8=
=qLZP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: