[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted rocm-cmake 5.2.3-1~0exp1 (source) into experimental



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 05 Sep 2022 20:58:03 +0200
Source: rocm-cmake
Architecture: source
Version: 5.2.3-1~0exp1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Deep Learning Team <debian-ai@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Étienne Mollier <emollier@debian.org>
Changes:
 rocm-cmake (5.2.3-1~0exp1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version
Checksums-Sha1:
 87802df278fa7d8a2031fe573454464836bba950 2099 rocm-cmake_5.2.3-1~0exp1.dsc
 15812ab3590234f8bcb33c66f5dce5ab9ef0fe23 44871 rocm-cmake_5.2.3.orig.tar.gz
 cc0e54759438528a62fdb715a3ae6db28409349d 2300 rocm-cmake_5.2.3-1~0exp1.debian.tar.xz
 00872ceabcf0b59e35b6458b7bc138d43a9b0316 6716 rocm-cmake_5.2.3-1~0exp1_amd64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 35a75b2c6426574a6d4216809c7309346a4e722222b115268dc469b86f909e25 2099 rocm-cmake_5.2.3-1~0exp1.dsc
 c63b707ec07d24fda5a2a6fffeda4df4cc04ceea5df3b8822cbe4e6600e358b4 44871 rocm-cmake_5.2.3.orig.tar.gz
 827e871756fffb22213f630a73e219c435d180347bc21db6dd1a7ee0f05d055c 2300 rocm-cmake_5.2.3-1~0exp1.debian.tar.xz
 b8a332bfae57fbd0b0e7d327215d319faa8f827a4f9cec5d6fa575ee358e9c7e 6716 rocm-cmake_5.2.3-1~0exp1_amd64.buildinfo
Files:
 e5187fce1f1f772a94b82465c1aa9abf 2099 devel optional rocm-cmake_5.2.3-1~0exp1.dsc
 4d88bf6460bf8ec7ab9fd065e4544241 44871 devel optional rocm-cmake_5.2.3.orig.tar.gz
 610e50cff93979f3fab7648d7be376ce 2300 devel optional rocm-cmake_5.2.3-1~0exp1.debian.tar.xz
 bd854885222cc001cedd2c2a68b41aa8 6716 devel optional rocm-cmake_5.2.3-1~0exp1_amd64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=guzu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: