[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted guile-gcrypt 0.3.0-1 (source) into experimental



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 23 May 2020 18:43:34 -0700
Source: guile-gcrypt
Architecture: source
Version: 0.3.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
Changed-By: Vagrant Cascadian <vagrant@debian.org>
Changes:
 guile-gcrypt (0.3.0-1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * New upstream version
   * debian/copyright: Update for new release.
   * debian/control:
     - Update to guile 3.0.
     - Update Standards-Version to 4.5.0, no changes.
Checksums-Sha1:
 da59bbd874c18136e83a04bcd0d4343829c3e1e8 1352 guile-gcrypt_0.3.0-1.dsc
 85882c5b8c6d65d4e8783eaca7943984eaf6be87 55022 guile-gcrypt_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz
 a67be1a7317e30aa61d2fc531b8933d8ea116459 6808 guile-gcrypt_0.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 8eb609540fd81136a4e8d672424d685342bbd217 5520 guile-gcrypt_0.3.0-1_arm64.buildinfo
Checksums-Sha256:
 dd0b327ac9c44bbc59e3c94ed73545e204aa298cb33c209ff0438072c01305fd 1352 guile-gcrypt_0.3.0-1.dsc
 07394c3de4f31a36ca2b670e1998c526de891d9436f12e94d8862ab081274d6a 55022 guile-gcrypt_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz
 99b5ddd0d6b20cf9878a43ad0432ec9fc6cd7084dfaa92f835b0eb7df2777009 6808 guile-gcrypt_0.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 faa17ebb2f3b997570be3914e50f6023a838c1d9a368824a252e2b351b08930d 5520 guile-gcrypt_0.3.0-1_arm64.buildinfo
Files:
 cbccacc16dc5a3a1192e78c249016bd1 1352 lisp optional guile-gcrypt_0.3.0-1.dsc
 9d87865a1f18de66fe9a5ddc720a1820 55022 lisp optional guile-gcrypt_0.3.0.orig.tar.gz
 ddcb7a43d4d5057a51d3fd1cd62e6193 6808 lisp optional guile-gcrypt_0.3.0-1.debian.tar.xz
 da5af0c8e49e522d517e80cb141dd665 5520 lisp optional guile-gcrypt_0.3.0-1_arm64.buildinfo

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIkEARYKADEWIQRlgHNhO/zFx+LkXUXcUY/If5cWqgUCXsnUEBMcdmFncmFudEBk
ZWJpYW4ub3JnAAoJENxRj8h/lxaq6rQBAMNM6fOEBmSHqey+cadUEGDEQ+OpiYQi
KxZDD7KebBZqAP4ldXPlGVvTCnqae2ErscZA0K8pTwNJo4IL9t5fY7IaCQ==
=b2vo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: