Accepted jdupes 1.6.2-4 (source) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 19:52:54 -0200
Source: jdupes
Binary: jdupes
Architecture: source
Version: 1.6.2-4
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eriberto@debian.org>
Changed-By: Joao Eriberto Mota Filho <eriberto@debian.org>
Description:
jdupes - identify and delete or link duplicate files
Changes:
jdupes (1.6.2-4) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* Using a single package again, as suggested by Christoph Anton Mitterer
<calestyo@scientia.net>. It will solve #848360 when uploaded to Sid.
Consequently:
- Changed debian/rules to build with BTRFS when over Linux.
- Removed debian/jdupes.install and debian/jdupes-btrfs.*
- Renamed debian/jdupes.docs to debian/docs.
- Renamed debian/README.source to debian/README.Debian. Updated all
information.
* debian/control:
- Added a Conflicts, Provides and Replaces fields to uninstall any
jdupes-btrfs from the system.
- Improved the description.
- Removed the package jdupes-btrfs.
* debian/copyright: updated the packaging copyright years.
* debian/patches/10_use-program-name-variable.patch.txt: a mistake. Removed.
Checksums-Sha1:
a6d5bd0d7e39d5d766afeca44741ccfb8f4147c8 1832 jdupes_1.6.2-4.dsc
af2420f31f3359255ba01a988c3f6571b537ac98 4196 jdupes_1.6.2-4.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
fb34c4f04feca5c289cafcad0989dd181a90e2b84a13033d646a19249d8e5e81 1832 jdupes_1.6.2-4.dsc
e6cc757fc35e45b2870b273c2145bf5743de0f2ef9c4bf9ab2a623e48b51e88a 4196 jdupes_1.6.2-4.debian.tar.xz
Files:
728adc9b1ba67bc7448dc829ee4f3ade 1832 utils optional jdupes_1.6.2-4.dsc
67923044b5029159b583f8a2140a188a 4196 utils optional jdupes_1.6.2-4.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=qTPM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: