Accepted kcontacts 16.04.0-1 (source) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Sat, 07 May 2016 10:50:17 +0200
Source: kcontacts
Binary: libkf5contacts-dev libkf5contacts-data libkf5contacts5
Architecture: source
Version: 16.04.0-1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian/Kubuntu Qt/KDE Maintainers <debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Maximiliano Curia <maxy@debian.org>
Description:
libkf5contacts-data - data files for kcontacts
libkf5contacts-dev - development files for kcontacts
libkf5contacts5 - address book API for KDE frameworks
Changes:
kcontacts (16.04.0-1) experimental; urgency=medium
.
[ Automatic packaging ]
* Bump Standards-Version to 3.9.8
* Add a .gitattributes file to use dpkg-mergechangelogs
* Update build-deps and deps with the info from cmake
* Update symbols files.
.
[ Maximiliano Curia ]
* Replace the "Historical name" ddeb-migration by its "Modern, clearer" replacement dbgsym-migration.
* Add upstream metadata (DEP-12)
* debian/control: Update Vcs-Browser and Vcs-Git fields
* Update install files
Checksums-Sha1:
bf335aac5493a0a569474b668c2abd77cc50dcb8 2376 kcontacts_16.04.0-1.dsc
695dab38ab0f296b29ef56f82ae49b073d70a49c 135540 kcontacts_16.04.0.orig.tar.xz
64cf82c3f376266e1f62d5b0d6735e1b95d77feb 8084 kcontacts_16.04.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
d7cb634a0e33a96d0f90029f230f813763b2ce13592a90b8d8a02e62d8939c25 2376 kcontacts_16.04.0-1.dsc
565b2163db0e98178c4aa3480fc4d1d7811cf850d74f077049148b4b48d551fb 135540 kcontacts_16.04.0.orig.tar.xz
26975cec2e5fff101a600808d45a3d7b597da0fa312cac3984e98b6949c23621 8084 kcontacts_16.04.0-1.debian.tar.xz
Files:
bdfe33fdce84bfa08c2d07678ad53fed 2376 libs optional kcontacts_16.04.0-1.dsc
35f3592c76f3ca705f0a9f2233d379d9 135540 libs optional kcontacts_16.04.0.orig.tar.xz
c46c9fb48cab8b6237c123869913b3bf 8084 libs optional kcontacts_16.04.0-1.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2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=1d9k
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: