[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Accepted gnupg2 2.1.11-6+exp1 (source) into experimental



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 23:27:43 -0400
Source: gnupg2
Binary: gnupg-agent scdaemon gpgsm gnupg2 gpgv2 dirmngr gpgv-udeb gpgv-win32
Architecture: source
Version: 2.1.11-6+exp1
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GnuPG Maintainers <pkg-gnupg-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
Description:
 dirmngr    - server for managing certificate revocation lists
 gnupg-agent - GNU privacy guard - cryptographic agent
 gnupg2     - GNU privacy guard - a free PGP replacement (new v2.x)
 gpgsm      - GNU privacy guard - S/MIME version
 gpgv-udeb  - minimal signature verification tool (udeb)
 gpgv-win32 - GNU privacy guard - signature verification tool (win32 build)
 gpgv2      - GNU privacy guard - signature verification tool (new v2.x)
 scdaemon   - GNU privacy guard - smart card support
Changes:
 gnupg2 (2.1.11-6+exp1) experimental; urgency=medium
 .
   * take over gpgv-win32 from gnupg 1.4 packaging
Checksums-Sha1:
 d1e49358df6e8cfdfa88fc571d20a9d00efd8a31 3022 gnupg2_2.1.11-6+exp1.dsc
 f9579afce42f659252e4e5f34b93159876bf0ea1 33303 gnupg2_2.1.11-6+exp1.debian.tar.bz2
Checksums-Sha256:
 6dde8d13160c27a67870e2bd657e0078cf1e65ac951ebef6a34f5ebc5c07cad6 3022 gnupg2_2.1.11-6+exp1.dsc
 e836c61e21ac9de701bd79ab38350ccc86474c8d21310e049f6f9f51bc84151e 33303 gnupg2_2.1.11-6+exp1.debian.tar.bz2
Files:
 8106b1b59a71ce7d01a484676bc9c3d4 3022 utils optional gnupg2_2.1.11-6+exp1.dsc
 30f7476d62c39c63b88d1e6e496fec86 33303 utils optional gnupg2_2.1.11-6+exp1.debian.tar.bz2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=SRIY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: