Accepted iortcw 1.42d+dfsg1-2 (source) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Format: 1.8
Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:39:40 +0000
Source: iortcw
Binary: rtcw rtcw-server rtcw-common rtcw-dbg
Architecture: source
Version: 1.42d+dfsg1-2
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian Games Team <pkg-games-devel@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Description:
rtcw - game engine for Return to Castle Wolfenstein
rtcw-common - common files for Return to Castle Wolfenstein
rtcw-dbg - debug symbols for the iortcw game engine
rtcw-server - standalone server for Return to Castle Wolfenstein
Changes:
iortcw (1.42d+dfsg1-2) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* apparmor: add a child profile for the "safe mode" popups (tested
with xmessage and zenity - kdialog will probably need more rules)
* apparmor: don't try to run dh_apparmor on non-Linux ports
* apparmor: #include the local snippets created by dh_apparmor
* Add patch to replace __DATE__ with $SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH if set;
that variable is set automatically by recent debhelper
* Add Documentation key to the systemd services
* Add a patch fixing some spelling mistakes in user-visible messages
(but not "persistant", which is unfortunately part of the API)
* Enable full compiler hardening
Checksums-Sha1:
052866bc59d3e22495d379dba9e1780f1eb9cba2 2294 iortcw_1.42d+dfsg1-2.dsc
ea518af570d8284f8a9c079a613ec1e5cd3a4250 33832 iortcw_1.42d+dfsg1-2.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
b0791729feef32fc77d13dbdf5c2d6b7e6ca6253d00461aedc41581ffac0e48a 2294 iortcw_1.42d+dfsg1-2.dsc
57b6a647a2111768b5d861db6ae2f95471ea91bcfae1e62cbf6d34ace35b7179 33832 iortcw_1.42d+dfsg1-2.debian.tar.xz
Files:
20cf8493790ed5ada690a21e917f2a5a 2294 contrib/games optional iortcw_1.42d+dfsg1-2.dsc
92a453db70942fc0ca0d0acc1614717c 33832 contrib/games optional iortcw_1.42d+dfsg1-2.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=UDp6
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: