Accepted gdk-pixbuf 2.31.7-3 (source) into experimental
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Format: 1.8
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2015 22:08:41 +0100
Source: gdk-pixbuf
Binary: libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0-dbg libgdk-pixbuf2.0-common libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev libgdk-pixbuf2.0-doc libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0-udeb gir1.2-gdkpixbuf-2.0
Architecture: source
Version: 2.31.7-3
Distribution: experimental
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Debian GNOME Maintainers <pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
Changed-By: Iain Lane <laney@debian.org>
Description:
gir1.2-gdkpixbuf-2.0 - GDK Pixbuf library - GObject-Introspection
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0 - GDK Pixbuf library
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0-dbg - GDK Pixbuf library - debug symbols
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-0-udeb - GDK Pixbuf library - minimal runtime (udeb)
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-common - GDK Pixbuf library - data files
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-dev - GDK Pixbuf library (development files)
libgdk-pixbuf2.0-doc - GDK Pixbuf library (documentation)
Changes:
gdk-pixbuf (2.31.7-3) experimental; urgency=medium
.
* debian/patches/skip-large-file-tests-instead-of-ooming: This didn't catch
all cases. Run some tests in a subprocess so that we can skip them if they
abort due to malloc failing.
Checksums-Sha1:
d84f6dfedb4a0402eb5698c44c4c50bf5bca95f9 2807 gdk-pixbuf_2.31.7-3.dsc
f5d7b0205d7a4fe38494f2da3de8ff545db9a088 13560 gdk-pixbuf_2.31.7-3.debian.tar.xz
Checksums-Sha256:
f357183964c8cbc0074878be3bb9a91faa3842bfc52832df6c9ac6043d6f795b 2807 gdk-pixbuf_2.31.7-3.dsc
bca0540ddff05fe272ac17b8f6eabe4478f95e49571693cf5d3ebe93e94cbdac 13560 gdk-pixbuf_2.31.7-3.debian.tar.xz
Files:
a99af3d077a0138ce84cbe29d5bea263 2807 libs optional gdk-pixbuf_2.31.7-3.dsc
2921d6b3c1e1caf185b1caf66d7284a5 13560 libs optional gdk-pixbuf_2.31.7-3.debian.tar.xz
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1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=hmtn
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: